View Issue Details
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0001205||SOGo||Backend Address Book||public||2011-03-24 15:43||2022-07-18 14:42|
|Priority||normal||Severity||minor||Reproducibility||have not tried|
|Summary||0001205: update the vcard handling to VCARD 4 spec|
The new spec is currently in revision stage:
Once completed, we should update our implementation.
|Tags||No tags attached.|
|has duplicate||0002796||new||SOGo Connector||Thunderbird Chat fields not Synced as Vcard 4.0 IMPP fields|
|has duplicate||0004090||new||SOGo||incomplete informations after exporting contacts|
|has duplicate||0004091||resolved||francis||SOGo||only one postal address of the same type gets stored in the database|
|related to||0001648||closed||ludovic||SOGo||Various common contact fields not supported|
|related to||0004893||new||SOGo||Not all types of emails and phone numbers shown in web interface|
|related to||0004929||resolved||ludovic||SOGo||Middle name field missing for contacts and not processed correctly when changed|
|related to||0005530||new||SOGo||Unable to create mailing list in Thunderbird 91 + Connector 78|
vCard 4.0 looks stable to me now.
vCard 4 also has the concept of lists so we could drop our "VLIST".
+1 for vCard 4.0
I recently found a number of field mapping problems between SOGo and eM Client relating to Address Book / Contacts. I believe if vCard 4.0 were properly implemented by both SOGo and eM Client, then they might be resolved without further problems. I have made a feature request to eM Client on this, but I'm not sure how far their forum system carries such things.
Other than this, SOGo is doing me quite nicely, thank you.
I would love to have the possibility to sync more fields, preferably all that can be entered&displayed on Thunderbird.
I've noticed missing REV property in SOGo vCard.
when i use apple address book groups are defines as
Support for vCard 4.0 would be nice - are there already any plans or timetables?
vCard 4.0 allows to specify a date without a year: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6350#section-4.3.1
There is no need to wait for vCard 4.0 becoming a standard considering that there are only proposed standards.
Definitely +1 although Thunderbirds 102 new address book does not yet support these attributes (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1777474) - But CardBook does it and If a standard will be adopted by MZLA it would be the RFC one...
|2012-01-24 15:02||Christian Mack||Note Added: 0003310|
|2012-02-08 20:27||ludovic||Note Added: 0003396|
|2012-02-24 13:53||Christian Mack||Relationship added||related to 0001648|
|2013-07-06 17:57||Ian J||Note Added: 0005742|
|2014-06-02 12:40||Christian Mack||Relationship added||has duplicate 0002796|
|2014-11-03 18:56||Apfelgriebs||Note Added: 0007651|
|2015-06-08 21:55||djordjije||Note Added: 0008602|
|2017-03-20 10:12||Christian Mack||Relationship added||has duplicate 0004090|
|2017-03-20 12:17||Christian Mack||Relationship added||has duplicate 0004091|
|2018-05-10 10:26||markus||Note Added: 0012870|
|2018-10-08 20:36||martintrinks||Note Added: 0013086|
|2019-11-28 10:37||Christian Mack||Relationship added||has duplicate 0004893|
|2019-11-29 15:22||Christian Mack||Relationship replaced||related to 0004893|
|2020-01-09 11:59||Christian Mack||Relationship added||related to 0004929|
|2021-08-04 08:24||Roman Riabenko||Note Added: 0015405|
|2022-06-02 18:25||francis||Note Edited: 0003396|
|2022-06-02 18:26||francis||Relationship added||related to 0005530|
|2022-07-18 14:42||pikachuprof.||Note Added: 0016137|