View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0002227 | SOGo | Web Calendar | public | 2013-02-04 23:21 | 2013-02-08 15:12 |
Reporter | pepelton | Assigned To | francis | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
Status | resolved | Resolution | no change required | ||
Product Version | 2.0.4b | ||||
Summary | 0002227: Loading user's calendar in web UI causes core dump | ||||
Description | I upgraded two separate SOGo servers to sogo-2.0.4a-1.centos6.i686 After the upgrade on both servers at least one user noticed that his " After upgrading to 2.0.4b the problem persists. | ||||
Additional Information | What is common with both users experiencing the problem is that they have been syncing events I managed to subscribe to one of the users' calendar in Thunderbird although I exported then the calendar to ICS and used an ICS validator, which reported: " Context for line 24: If I compare it to a working calendar I see the difference that there " Is the DTSTAMP with TZID perhaps something Sogo cannot handle? | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Can you attach the vCalendar of the event (it should contain the vTimezone and the vEvent)? |
|
Here is what I found: If I backup the calendar with sogo-tool, remove the calendar and try to restore it, the restore chokes (dumps as well) on some events: " Here is the event's vCalendar entry: " Here is another from other user's calendar:
BEGIN:VEVENT If I delete the events from the backup file and then restore with sogo-tool, the calendar starts working. But some of the users have quite many of these kind of events so fixing them manually isn't really a good option... Can you identify what the problem is from these events or should I produce more examples? |
|
Going through the calendar entries I found broken ones that were generated via SOGo as well (I think the ones I reported earlier were originally from other sources like Funambol). Here is an example:
VERSION:2.0 |
|
Have you updated all the SOPE packages? |
|
These are the packages I have installed: gnustep-base-1.23.0-1.i686 Comparing this to the packages listed on the download page for CentOS6 I notice one difference: I have sope49-cards-2.0_20120418-1.centos6.i686 when what is available on the download site is sope49-cards-2.0.4b-1.centos6.x86_64.rpm. I guess I have updated the servers at some point to use a nightly package and then have forgotten about it. I upgraded to the sope49-cards-2.0.4b package and the problem appears to be solved. Thanks for pointing me to the right direction. |
|
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2013-02-04 23:21 | pepelton | New Issue | |
2013-02-06 13:37 | francis | Note Added: 0005353 | |
2013-02-06 20:12 | pepelton | Note Added: 0005363 | |
2013-02-06 22:07 | pepelton | Note Added: 0005368 | |
2013-02-07 16:11 | francis | Note Added: 0005370 | |
2013-02-07 20:46 | pepelton | Note Added: 0005372 | |
2013-02-07 20:50 | ludovic | Status | new => closed |
2013-02-07 20:50 | ludovic | Resolution | open => no change required |
2013-02-08 15:12 | francis | Status | closed => resolved |
2013-02-08 15:12 | francis | Assigned To | => francis |